• November 5, 2024

Phillies talked to Rangers about Young?

One would have to think that the Phillies payroll is already stretched to the max after they added Cliff Lee this offseason. But, did they maybe think that they could squeeze Michael Young in here from the Rangers?

According to Jerry Crasnick of ESPN, they at least thought about it. Crasnick says that three MLB sources told him that the Phillies had “brief” discussions with the Rangers regarding 3B Michael Young. But, his report also says that the talks didn’t really go anywhere and that they are no longer active. So you basically just got me excited about nothing. Thanks, Jerry.

Young has demanded a trade out of Texas, saying that he was “manipulated and misled” by the team. He has a no-trade clause and has a list of possible teams that he’ll accept a trade to. That list includes the Colorado Rockies, Los Angeles Dodgers and Angels, San Diego Padres, New York Yankees, Minnesota Twins, Houston Astros and St. Louis Cardinals. Most astute individuals will note that the Phillies aren’t on that list.

However, Young said that he might be willing to go to a team that isn’t currently on that designated list.

“As of right now, no. But I think those things are handled on a case-by-case basis,” Young said. “Those are things my family and I would talk about and see what’s ultimately the best fit for us.”

The 34-year old Young hit .284 last year with 21 bombs and 91 RBI’s.

I’m not thrilled that the talks are supposedly dead, but anything could still happen. Hey Nolan, what do you think of Joe Blanton? We have a World Series champion sitting right here for you! Just let us know!

Young is due $48 million over the next three years, so while it’s fun to dream, I just don’t see the Phillies having room on the payroll. Sure, if they sent Joe Blanton ($17 million between 2011 and 2012) and Placido Polanco ($5.16 million…I’d assume his name would come up) and whoever else to Texas (Ibanez?), it would certainly lighten the load. But, I just don’t this happening.

Then again, I didn’t think Cliff Lee was happening either.

Micah Warren

Read Previous

Who is the best team in Philadelphia right now?

Read Next

NHL Trade Deadline Dominoes Beginning to Fall

0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tjp2033
tjp2033
February 9, 2011 9:28 pm

Im guessing the deal had nothing to do with Polanco but probably a deal with Ibanez and Blanton and the Phillies using Young in LF. They probably also asked for the Rangers to eat some salary and the Rangers didn’t like the deal, at least at the moment.

paulman
paulman
February 9, 2011 11:04 pm

**Paulman Trade Alert**

Phils Trade RHP J BLanton and LF R Ibanez to the Texas Rangers for
3B M YOung and a minor league Pitcher

Phils then shift Polanco to LF and play M Young at 3B

***********************************************************************

tjp2033
tjp2033
February 10, 2011 12:43 am

If the Phillies somehow pulled the trigger on that trade I think you would see Young in LF and keep Polanco at 3B. The guy still plays a stellar 3B. Young on the other hand is not the elite fielder he once was. They would move him to LF and then you have your #5 hitter.

But that 48 million over the next 3 years is a big chunk of change. I can’t see this deal unless Texas took some of the contract but that will not happen.

greenfan
greenfan
February 10, 2011 8:52 am

I heard Crasnick on the radio last night….he said that the offer from the Phils was Blanton & Polanco….with Young playing 3rd…..Texas didn’t like the offer he said

tjp2033
tjp2033
February 10, 2011 10:31 am

Ya I could see why they didn’t like it. They have no place for Polanco to play. Beltre is signed long term and for major money to play 3B. Polanco isn’t your prototypical DH so that wouldn’t be a good deal for Texas.

paulman
paulman
February 10, 2011 11:32 am

That’s why Ibanez would work better for the Rangers than Polanco.
They could use a DH/4th OF to replace V Geurrero who signed with the
Orioles.. I think Ibanez could do well in that role..